FANDOM


By Prof. L. Kaliambos ( Natural Philosopher in New Energy)

LefterisKaliambosbiography2 html m60f75e23

4 February 2019

After my published paper "Nuclear structure is governed by the fundamental laws of electromagnetism" (2003) today it is well known that all experiments of atomic and nuclear physics reject relativity. (Experiments reject relativity). Under this condition the energy in OUR EARLY UNIVERSE  did not turn to mass, because Einstein’s concept of Mass-Energy Conservation is invalid.

It is of interest to note that in 1993 I presented at the international conference "Frontiers of fundamental physics" my discovery of the dipole nature of photon which led to my discovery of the law of  PHOTON-MATTER INTERACTION given by

hν/m = ΔΕ/ΔΜ = c2

Here the photon absorption in both experiments of the photoelectric effect (1905) and of the Compton scattering (1923) contributes not only to the increase of the electron energy ΔΕ but also to the increase of the electron mass ΔΜ under a quantum length contraction and a quantum time dilation, which cannot be related with Einsteins ideas of space and time. (Discovery of length contraction). 

Historically, Newton in 1704 predicted the bending of his rectangular particles of light when they pass near the sun confirmed by Soldner in 1801.Later though the famous experiment of Michelson and Morley (1887) rejected the Maxwellian ether (1865) in favor of Newton’s particles of light, Einstein influenced by Maxwell’s fallacious fields believed that light consists of  his massless quanta of fields. So he explained incorrectly the photoelectric effect which led to his invalid relativity. (EXPERIMENTS REJECT EINSTEIN). In fact the increase of the electron mass ΔΜ in the quantum physics of non conservative forces is due to the real absorption of the photon mass m = hν/c2  . 

Moreover Einstein believed incorrectly that the mass is not simply a measure of the quantity of matter after all. In other words Einstein violated the conservation law of mass. Then in trying to understand such a fallacious change of mass with speed Einstein was led to the invalid concept that kinetic energy ΔE added to a ponderable object also adds inertia in an amount  ΔE/c2  by assuming that energy has mass since the kinetic energy of a moving particle with respect to a randomly moving observer should  be redefined incorrectly as

ΔE = ΔΜc2  = Mc2 – Moc2

In this fallacious idea Mo is the wrong rest mass as a stationary object with respect to a randomly moving observer. Also the so called-relativistic mass M  is  a fallacious concept leading to serious complications. For example according to Einstein’s wrong relativity an observer moving with an electron in the laboratory will measure the increase of mass of all stationary objects in the laboratory.

One of the important properties of mass is that  it cannot be created or destroyed in accordance with my discovery of the Photon-Matter Interaction.  Unfortunately Einstein under his confusing formula E = mc2 complicated more the problem by introducing  his additional  wrong assumption  that energy turns to mass. Under this crisis of physics which did much to retard the progress of nuclear physics, Einstein  himself pointed out:

“Pre-relativity physics contains two conservation laws of fundamental importance, namely, the law of conservation of energy and the law of conservation of mass; these two appear there as completely independent of each other. Through relativity theory they melt together into one principle.”

It is of interest to note that the Bohr model (1913) and the Schrodinger equation in three dimensions (1926) based on natural laws showed that the energy hν of the generated photon in the formation of atoms is due not to the mass defect of the proton –electron system but to the energy of the charge-charge interaction between the electron and the proton. Thus the mass defect  ΔΜ turns into the photon  mass m = hν/c2  in accordance with my discovery of the Photon-Matter Interaction. Nevertheless today physicists continue to believe that the nuclear binding energy is due to the nuclear mass defect. Under this crisis of nuclear physics I published my paper of 2003 by showing that the energy of the generated photon is due not to the nuclear mass defect but to the electromagnetic energy between  neutrons and protons, because I discovered that  the proton and the neutron consist of  9 extra charged quarks and 12 ones respectively existing among 288 quarks in nucleons.(See my DISCOVERY OF QUARKS IN PROTON AND NEUTRON ).

Of course Einstein’s  fallacious concepts of relativistic energy (Mc2) and rest energy Moc2) violate dramatically the well-established laws of nature according to which energy is due not to the mass but to the fundamental force of interaction. Under his confusion Einstein introduced the invalid Mass-energy equivalence. Unfortunately today physicists continue to believe that in OUR EARLY UNIVERSE the energy turned into mass and also in nuclear phenomena they believe that the mass defect turns into the energy of generated photons.  Moreover in the so-called annihilation physicists believe that the mass of  electron and positron turns to the energy of the two generated gamma rays. So in the “Annihilation-WIKIPEDIA” one reads the following wrong paragraph:  

“When an electron and a positron collide to annihilate and create gamma rays, energy is given off. Both particles have a rest energy of 0.511 mega electron volts (MeV). When the mass of the two particles is converted entirely into energy, this rest energy is what is given off. The energy is given off in the form of the aforementioned gamma rays. Each of the gamma rays has an energy of 0.511 MeV.".

Of course in this false idea which did much to retard the progress of physics Einstein influenced  by his fallacious massless quanta of fields did not use the successful idea of the Bohr model according to which the energy E of the charge-charge interaction between the negative electron and the positive proton turns into the energy hf of the generated photon. So he avoided to write the very obvious energy E of the charge-charge interaction between the positive positron and the negative electron which turns into the energy 2hν of the two generated two photons.

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.